7.30.2007

Farewell, Ingmar



Ingmar Bergman, the “poet with the camera” who is considered one of the greatest directors in motion picture history, died today on the small island of Faro where he lived on the Baltic coast of Sweden, Astrid Soderbergh Widding, president of The Ingmar Bergman Foundation, said. Bergman was 89.
The NY Times obituary continues here.
A nice assortment of online clips of the director's best films is available here.
A 2004 review of a Bergman retrospective, finely written by Anthony Lane of The New Yorker.
The best editions of Bergman's films, including this favorite of mine, are available from Criterion. Do yourself a favor and see all of them. No true fan of what film is capable of should be ignorant of this director and his incomparable work.

7.28.2007

Highlights from My Summer Job

Still in training, then. I've surprised at least two of my former students who work there. I'm not sure which of us has been more embarassed. Anyway, here are some observations:

  • One of the trainers is this middle-aged dude named Brad. He kind of looks like a taller, fatter version of George Costanza. He prefers to be called B-Rad, as if he were some sort of street fighting gangsta. Among his many annoying habits is a tendency to enter our training room unexpectedly and yell "Woo-hoo!" at ear-piercing volume. He also likes to sing novelty songs while walking in the hallway ("Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport" seems to be his favorite) and he usually speaks to people using exaggerated accents, which I'm sure he thinks are hilarious. Meryl Streep, he ain't.
  • On Pioneer Day, our trainer took us outside so we could watch the scheduled fireworks. Because of heavy thunderstorms in the area during the prior week, no fireworks were forthcoming, but we stood patiently in the parking lot for 35 minutes waiting for them. On the clock.
  • One of the members of our 8-person trainee team had to leave unexpectedly early one night when she learned that her ex-husband had been convicted of murder in Las Vegas. Or at least that's what she told us. If she just wanted to get out of work early, she picked a real doozy of an excuse.
  • Another member of our trainee team, an 18-year-old female, recently spent several minutes during classtime telling us about her apparently mandatory AA meetings. So much for anonymity, then. Not to mention sobriety (as she was happy to report how many tequila shots she had put away earlier in the week).
  • As part of our training, we are regularly introducted to floor managers, those people we will supposedly be working under after the completion of our training. One such manager, who I'll call Otis, introduced himself to us while sporting a trucker hat (pitched at a rakish angle, natch) and a large, untucked blue shirt. He looked about 19 and at least 150 pounds overweight. He has had six months of managerial experience, all of which was gained at the local Arby's. The day he was introduced to us was his first day as a manager, and he was at a distinct loss for words when our trainer invited us to ask him questions about our upcoming positions. He mostly looked at the table in front of him.
  • After Otis left the room, our trainer fell into a nearly 30 minute rant about how she had applied for the position Otis had obtained, how much more qualified she was for the job, and how disheartened she felt by the upper management's decision. Keep in mind that, for at least some of us, Otis could very well be our future boss, and that we had spent much of our first week in training learning how much the company values its employees, even the ones who get turned down for managerial positions.
  • Last Friday, two of the trainees begged our trainer to let them take a few extra minutes on lunch break so they could go home and get their Wii. Our trainer had previously expressed some curiousity about the gaming system and wanted to see what it looked like. Not only did she grant the two trainees about 15 minutes of extra lunch time (an offer not extended to the rest of the class), but we spent the final hour of classtime (again, on the clock) playing Wii Bowling and Wii Boxing. When it was time to clock out for the night, the entire class was completely engaged in Bowling. I'm not even sure they noticed that I left.

After three weeks of training, I have yet to perform any task resembling the job I was presumably hired to do. Most of the training, when we do train, consists of tedious gif-animated computer lessons (which seem to consistently befuddle the 65-ish-year-old woman in our class) and search exercises on the company's database. Other than the time I spent collecting unemployment when I was a seasonal employee for the IRS, and when I was living off of student loans in Ohio, this is the easiest money I have ever made. I plan to take over the company in six months.

Something

Read a poorly written article on the Beatles breakup this morning--full of rather trite assumptions about the band's collective and individual states of mind around the time Paul's "Get Back" project got started. Despite the article's lameness, though, it did motivate me to pull out the last DVD in my Beatles Anthology collection, which provides the band's reflections on the breakup with 25 or so years of hindsight.

Among the wonderful clips included in the Anthology is this promo video for George's "Something", featuring shots of all the boys and their respective partners at the time. I am always struck by the genuineness of the expressions of the people in this video, particularly Patti Harrison's smiles at George. Christ, they're all so young!

Another moving factor to the video now is the fact that so many of the faces here are gone: George, John, Linda. For some reason, I find the shots of Linda particularly moving. She has a very natural and open face here, and even though I was never a particular fan of hers, she is captured here in a very flattering light.

The seeming innocence of the video is also striking, particularly when one considers what must have been a great deal of personal animosity between the band members around the time this video was shot.

And, of course, the song itself is gorgeous and, to my mind, one of the ten best songs the Beatles ever produced.

Enjoy this little reminder of our collective mortality, then. It never fails to get me a bit teary.

7.23.2007

His Last Chance to Say It

The scene in question (see entry below), from the Season 2 finale.

Burning Up a Sun


NOTE: This entry contains spoilers regarding the final episode of the second season of Doctor Who.

Among the revelations in the latest incarnation of Doctor Who is the insight into the Doctor's relationships with his companions. We now know (if one hadn't guessed before) why the Doctor doesn't stay with his companions for very long (assuming they don't leave own their own accord or die while trying to save the Earth): quite simply, they will someday die, while he will undergo yet another cellular regeneration. We also know that the Doctor is quite fond of some of his companions, a fondness bordering on, if it does not fully achieve, love. He loves Sarah Jane Smith, as the episode "School Reunion" clarified, and he certainly loves Rose Tyler, to the point where, for the first time in the program's history, he was on the verge of telling her just before he lost all contact with her forever (as seen in the Season 2 finale, "Doomsday.").

Originally conceived as a children's program, the show adopted a kind of wink-and-nudge approach to the Doctor's companions, and what might be going on in the infinite halls of the TARDIS between televised episodes. In the early years of the show, such questions were almost moot, since the Doctor was generally portrayed by older actors, and the Doctor's companions were largely girls in their early teens or middle-aged men (or, in the first year of the show, the Doctor's own granddaughter).

In the 1970's, the Doctor became a more romantic, and occasionally dashing, figure, and his companions were generally young adult women. This process of sexing up the Doctor's companions perhaps reached its zenith with Leela, a woman from a pre-industrial civilization who felt most comfortable wearing what appeared to be low-cut animal skins. No doubt the producers of the program found companions like Leela useful for drawing in the adult audience, while the younger set remained captivated by the Doctor's own charm and the terrifying appeal of enemies like the Daleks.

The recent return of the program has dealt with more adult themes, especially in regard to the Doctor's companions and the darkness of the Doctor's past. The Doctor has been seen in romantic interludes, and his two most recent companions, Rose Tyler and Martha Jones, have both expressed their love for him openly.

The conclusion of "Doomsday" is the most affecting companion departure since "Earthshock," when Adric initiates the extinction of the dinosaurs and his badge for mathematical excellence crumbles to dust as the Doctor uses it to choke a few Cybermen. The departure of Rose Tyler is also one of Doctor Who's schmaltzier moments, complete with swelling strings on the soundtrack and runny mascara. But it's also a beautifully conceived farewell, and one that adds to the character of the Doctor himself. For the first time, at least as far as I know, the Doctor sheds tears.

This particular episode hit home for me in several surprising ways. The Doctor's paternalistic relationships had often reminded me of the kind of relationship teachers try to establish with their students, relationships which serve to engage the student's curiousity and devotion for the subject. When one has a machine that will travel through time and space, I suppose creating these relationships is somewhat easier, but, just as on the TARDIS, a disgruntled or bored student is a dangerous companion to have in the classroom. So any good teacher will, like the Doctor, use the classroom as a kind of TARDIS, where anything is possible.

The emotional departure of Rose Tyler is perhaps a more emotional goodbye than one might expect to receive from a student leaving a classroom at the end of a semester. However, the strength of the Doctor's relationship with Rose, and his hesitancy (or inability) to express his love for her, is very similar to relationships I have had with some of my students.

Before going any further with this, let me here clarify my use of the term "relationship." In doing so, keep in mind the earlier, perhaps more naive, years of Doctor Who, in which there could be no overt or even implied suggestion that the Doctor's relationships were anything but platonic, even if your companion was prone to wearing low-cut animal skins. Such is the necessity of the teacher's relationship with students. Any complication of the learning process with expressions of "personal" emotions would constitute an ethical problem.

I say this knowing full well that I have been, on at least two occasions in my education, the recepient of such emotions, that I have known and worked with professors who have carried on emotional and sexual relationships with their students, and that I have, on rare occasions, felt that my relationship with a student could extend beyond the classroom. It is more common for me, however, to experience what I clumsily refer to as a "teacher crush."

This happens, on average, to me with at least one student per semester. There will be a student who is either exceptionally conversational in class, engagingly witty, or charmingly naive. These students have always been women, though not necessarily women who look like Scarlett Johansson. Sometimes they will be the kind of women who might wear low-cut animal skins, though more often than not they are likely to be the kind of women who laugh at my in-class jokes. But I love them. And, like the Doctor, I will almost certainly never tell them.

There was Lacey Jane, who, like Martha Jones, was going into medicine. She was a good Mormon girl, interested in raising a family after she graduated, about as far from my life as a Scottish Highlander. I begged her to consider becoming a doctor, rather than a nurse. She was smart enough to do more with her life than insert IVs.

There was Tiffany, who was/is related to a popular country music singer. She was a bit of an airhead, but recognized that the trappings of being the "It Girl" on campus were rather limiting. She once told me how funny it would be to pose for Playboy.

There was Rachel, who could speak Elvish. There was Joy, who spent hours at a time in my office telling me about photography. There was the girl whose name I can no longer remember from my first semester of teaching who unabashedly flirted with me in class. She was a non-traditional student and we would often joke about the other, younger students.

Now, I'm not dull enough to think that all of these students were as interested in spending time in my office as I was in having them there. Nor would I dare to presume that any of these students would think of me in the same way that Rose Tyler thinks of the Doctor (or even cry when I left them). But, like the Doctor in the confines of his freshly empty TARDIS, I might release a lonely sigh at the end of a semester, knowing that I will likely never see my one special companion again. But within a few weeks of the following semester, I would almost certainly "choose" another one, and forget all about any of her predecessors.

This post will be continued. Check in during the next few days for the conclusion. In the meantime, please share your comments and/or questions.

What He Said (Five Months Before the Invasion)

. . . Even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn’t simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.


Delivered by this man on 26 October 2002 in Chicago at Federal Plaza at an anti Iraq war rally organized by the ANSWER coalition.

Full text here.

Sicko Ratings Conspiracy?

The outdoor marquee of the chain theater closest to my house is posting Michael Moore's latest film, Sicko, with an R rating. The film is actually rated PG-13, properly indicated on the theater's webpage. After seeing the film, I started thinking about what, if any, motivations the chain might have for posting an incorrect rating.

Cedar City, like most towns in Utah, is predominately populated by Mormons, many of whom refuse to see R-rated films (although they seem to have no compunction about watching them when the content has been clumsily edited to remove any hint of sexuality or overt violence, a process that makes films like Saving Private Ryan or Shakespeare in Love virtually pointless). Since Fahrenheit 9/11, Michael Moore has become the Great Satan of American right-wingers, though Sicko takes shots at both political parties and is probably Moore's least politicized film in some time, at least in a partisan sense. But any Mormon curious enough to think for him/herself and actually go see the film would undoubtedly turn away after seeing that the film carried an R-rating.

I'm not sure why a theater owner would deliberately try to reduce the number of patrons coming in to see a film, so the marquee rating is most likely a mistake. But what sort of assumptions are behind that mistake? Did the theater worker (most likely also a Mormon) assume that Moore was such a flaming liberal that there was no way one of his films could earn anything less than an R-rating? Was the theater worker exercising some crude form of political protest, unbeknownst to the theater owner? Or is there a much larger conspiracy at work, one that would ensure that only an audience predisposed to agree with most of Moore's points would actually attend the film?

Moore's film alternately touches, amuses, and infuriates the viewer with its depictions of average insurance-covered Americans who have been ignored by a health care system primarily concerned with profit. It's inflammatory, sure, but Moore doesn't let people like Hilary Clinton slide by without an appropriate jab at the donations her campaign has received from insurance corporations. The film will piss you off, but probably not just because you're a right-wing religious conservative who doesn't want to be exposed to dangerous ideas or images. Political discretion is advised.

A Bad Summer for Periodicals and Paulie Walnuts

This weekend, I made my monthly trip to Vegas to pick up all the expensive magazines that I can't find within 50 miles of where I live. (It was also the first such mag run I've been able to make since last May, when I got my last paycheck from spring semester.) It was a good run, too. I finally found a copy of Justice Society #3, so now I can read the subsequent issues that have been gathering dust in my read pile. (One of the rewards of reading comics is its continual reinforcement of delayed gratification.)

The comic book shop where I go to pick up back issues had relocated into a brighter, cleaner, and longer facility, although the owner chose to arrange the merchandise in almost the exact same way as the old shop. I guess that makes it easier for the loyal customers (and what comic shop today doesn't rely on at least 75% of its business coming from loyal customers?), but it seems kind of a waste of a move to not change things around a bit.

Also found a nice Italian place that wasn't outrageously priced and made me feel like Paulie Walnuts. And who doesn't want to feel like Paulie Walnuts?

The downside to the whole trip was picking up the lastest issue of Punk Planet and reading this on the cover:

There's no easy way to put this, so it's best to simply say it straight: This is the last issue of Punk Planet.

I've read PP for several years, and often incorporate its articles into my classes. Its espousal of the indie ethic extended to music, politics, books, comix, zines, sex, fiction, and cooking. I'm heartbroken that it's folding. (If you missed out on this vital publication, pre-2007 back issues are available on the website for a buck apiece.)

I learned this morning that another of my favorite periodicals (although completely different from PP in its philosophy, distribution, and content) will be folding within the next few weeks: The Weekly World News. Another mainstay of my classes (particularly when discussing how to assess a source's credibility), I never miss an opportunity to page through it in the checkout lines. And any fan of Men in Black will tell you that it contains the best damn investigative reporting on the planet.

There's no lack of other stuff to read out there, but it's particularly disappointing to see an important political magazine disappear in these challenging times, and yet another influential contributor to popular culture slink away into the dark, smelly basement of Americana.

7.20.2007

At Our Best When Things Are at Their Worst


The story of this woman, a victim of Wednesday's steam pipe explosion in NYC, is told by the man on the left in today's New York Times. Great reading.

Chazzbot Teases You with Bold Promises and Spooky Videos!

It's all too tempting to turn the Glory That Is Chazzbot into just another video-hosting blog, especially when I come across gorgeously filmed and musically haunting videos like this.

I'm mentally preparing an essay-length post that will combine an expression of my love for the Season 2 finale of Doctor Who with some musings on the conflicted feelings of love I sometimes have for certain students.

While you're patiently waiting for that bombshell, please enjoy the musical stylings of Bat for Lashes.

7.13.2007

Put Your Paws on These Riches!

Brought to my attention by Entertainment Weekly's PopWatch.

My Agency Doesn't Let Me Do Overtime

I was going to tell you all about my new summer job as a customer service representative for the New AT&T, but I think you will probably get much of the same information in a more entertaining fashion by reading this feature from The Onion and this brilliant, honest essay (in PDF format) from loyal Chazzbot reader, Brandon Schrand.

Anyway, my schedule for the next few weeks consists of teaching my summer class in the early afternoon and working nights as a phone jockey. Actually, before I start healing the wounds of AT&T customers, I have to get through eight weeks of easy money--er--extensive training. At the end of my first week, the ratio of classtime worked out to approximately 2.5 hours per night spent on actual training, 3 hours spent listening to our trainer's stories of how she deals with bad customer service at hospitals and local restaurants, 1 hour of arts & crafts (Seriously. Last night we made fold-up paper pyramids featuring the five steps of account verification.) and 1.5 hours of listening to the three Vegas transplants in our class telling us how lame life in Southern Utah is. Whee!

Maybe I'll share some training stories later. In the meantime, hope you're enjoying your summer.

7.06.2007

50 Years Ago

On July 6, 1957, Paul McCartney was introduced to John Lennon and invited the 16-year-old to join his band.

If this seems like a trivial detail to you, take a moment to imagine your music collection, your neighborhood record store, the printed lyrics in your CD booklets, the concept of an album as an artistic statement, music videos, tape looping, orchestrated pop songs, popular music as an artistic statement, impromptu rooftop concerts, recorded feedback, your favorite band on a late-night talk show, and stadium concerts.

Then, try to imagine a world without them.

More on their meeting here. Here's a list of who wrote which song in the Beatles oeuvre.

A more extensive account of the Lennon/McCartney introduction is given in Bob Spitz's biography of the band, the best, and most comprehensive, book on the Beatles I've ever read.

7.03.2007

The Twilight's Last Gleaming

A day early, here's my nomination for a new national anthem:

Doing the Lord's Work


Great article in the Washington Post today about the embattled George W. and his growing concerns over his legacy. There are many enlightening details in the article, but none to answer the question of how the American public let this fuck steal the office in two elections, why Bush never bothered to question himself during his previous six years in office, or why it has taken the nation's news media this long to notice the emperor's lack of clothes, dignity, or humility.

Still, I gained a smug sense of satisfaction reading the piece. The inner me (who, apparently, is always shouting with the gusto of an inebriated football fan) was, like, "Woo-hoo! Fuck you, asshole! Choke! Choke! Choke!"

But there are some troubling details of Bush's presidency that have yet to be addressed seriously. Among them:

Michael Novak, a theologian who participated [in "scholarly" discussions Bush has been hosting in the White House], said it was clear that Bush weathers his difficulties because he sees himself as doing the Lord's work.

"His faith is very strong," said Novak, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. "Faith is not enough by itself because there are a lot of people who have faith but weak hearts. But his faith is very strong. He seeks guidance, like every other president does, in prayer. And that means trying to be sure he's doing the right thing. And if you've got that set, all the criticism, it doesn't faze you very much. You're answering to God."

You know who else is answering to God, Mr. Novak? How about the 3500 Americans your president has sent to die for a lie? There's a legacy for Bush to fret over, assuming he's capable of worrying about anything other than himself and what God thinks of him.

So This Means. . . NO Nudity?

Online Dating

Mingle2 - Online Dating