4.25.2006

Programming Note

Chazzbot will resume regular updates after the completion of Spring semester (on or shortly after May 5). Please return then as we begin celebrating Chazzbot's first full year of pointless commentary and profane dialogue.

If you are in need of stimulating blogtalk in the meantime, please visit the links found on the right side of the page.

See you in May!

4.12.2006

In Action, How Like an Angel


Celebrating 45 years of human achievement in space

and 25 years of running in place.

Educator of the Year

So for the last two months or so, I've been presenting a weekly film screening at Dixie State. The films are shown in a good-sized auditorium with stereo sound and a video projector. The screenings are open to the public and I do not charge admission. Most of the films are from my personal collection of DVDs, and I receive no compensation for the screenings.

My initial motivation for starting the film series was, I admit, entirely selfish. I was impressed by the projectors available in most of the classrooms at Dixie and started plotting ways to utilize them after class hours to watch movies I liked with a good sound system and a larger-than-TV screen. I started asking around my department if anyone else would be interested in some kind of weekly film screening. Then I was told that a former instructor at Dixie named Bob Dalton had initiated a similar program several years ago, and had carried it on for some 20 years.

I agreed to prepare a list of films and honor Dalton's legacy by naming the screenings after him. Thus began the 2006 Bob Dalton Film Series.

The screenings have never drawn in a large number of people, but I have developed a small but loyal audience, largely composed of retirees from the community. I've learned of a budding film buff club in St. George and have fielded many phone calls from people wondering where they can go to see something besides the predictable crap Hollywood spews forth every week. I have been pleasantly surprised to find a true hunger for quality films in the St. George community. Within a few weeks of starting the series, I was asked to appear on a live interview program for KCSG-TV, a small local station.

The goal of the series, such as it is, is to provide a range of foreign and independent films that are not widely known but are deserving of a larger audience. The series has included the following films so far:

Grand Illusion (1938)
Beauty & the Beast (1946)
The 400 Blows (1959)
The Naked Kiss (1964)
The Red Violin (1999)
Walkabout (1971)
And the Ship Sails On (1984)

As you can see from the list, I've tried to offer a variety of English and non-English language films from different time periods.

Here is the announcement I sent out over campus e-mail yesterday about this week's film:

The 2006 Bob Dalton Film Series continues this Thursday night with a screening of the 1997 film, "The Life of Jesus," beginning at 7:30 PM in the Dunford Auditorium. The screening is open to everyone.

Bruno Dumont's directorial debut follows the life of 20-year-old Freddy and his gang of mean-spirited friends who battle boredom and aimlessness in Northern France, generally by making harmless trouble for local Arab immigrants. But when an Arab man proposes to Freddy's sometime girlfriend, violent racism erupts. "The Life of Jesus" won the French Prix Jean Vigo in 1997 for Best First Feature.

"The Life of Jesus" runs 96 minutes. The film is not rated, but contains scenes of violence and sexuality equivalent to an R-rating. The film is presented in French with English subtitles.

So far, so good. Then, shortly after sending the announcement, I received this in my mailbox:

Chazzbot,

I object to an "equivalent to an R-rating" film being shown on campus. Art can be instructive, informative, and uplifting without degrading content which is "equivalent to an R-rating".

France is a wonderful and beatiful place with an abundance of art in many, many forms, but some of the French people have a low regard for morality. We as instructors CAN bring the beauty and appreciation of art in its many forms to the Dixie State College campus without bringing the ILLUSTRATION of immorality. We, as instructors on campus have an obligation to uplift our students and open their minds and we CAN do this while encouraging high moral and ethical standards. In fact the communities in which we live EXPECT us to instruct while encouraging high morals and ethical standards.

I am asking that you replace this Screening with some other film that reflects our community standards.

Thank you for your support.

Nick L, CPA, MBA
Adjunct Instructor
Department of Business.

Where to begin? The author's sterotyping of the French (with no mention, naturally, of his countrymen's own "low regard for morality")? The expectation that higher education be tailored to the moral standards of the community? The gall of requesting a change to a film program the author has never, to my knowledge, attended? The ignorance of MPAA rating protocals regarding foreign films? The author's severly limited definition of art? The block capitals? What can you say to attitudes like this coming from a man who teaches college-level students?

That's not even mentioning the underlying assumption that college students and community members are too stupid to make up their own minds about what they choose to see, or that a free film screening is enough to overthrow their pre-established values. If their values are that weak, then they have more problems than being subjected to the equivalent of an R-rating. And if college students (or anyone for that matter) never have their values challenged, then what's the point of having any values in the first place?

I hate to assume that the title of this particular film has anything to do with Nick's passionate objections to it, but it seems odd that he's chosen to offer his objections to R-rated films in my series just two weeks before the series comes to an end.

And in case you think I'm the only educator on campus dealing with this kind of provincialism in regard to film screenings at Dixie State College, check out this story on another campus screening.

Anyway, I'll continue my series until the end of the semester. I don't expect to ever see Nick there, whether or not I happen to show a film that he finds acceptable (based on its MPAA rating, of course, not on any inherent qualities the film may have). Nor do I expect to change the attitudes most of the school's administration seems to share. But at every screening, beneath the film's soundtrack, I listen for the telltale pop of some viewer's head coming out of the ground to see something they've never seen before. Maybe a Frenchman. Maybe an idea.

4.09.2006

Chazzbot Is Linked!

Someone read my earlier post on the 10 books that changed my life and linked my post in their blog. As far as I know, this marks the first time someone I don't know personally has blogged me. Pretty fucking awesome.

[There's a link to Chazzbot over at Mike Sterling's Progressive Ruin, but it's an indirect reference (look on the right side of the screen under "Other Weblogs"). Oh, and Diary of a Dilletante has a link to me, too. He knows my brother. Not that I'm not appreciative of both of those shoutouts.]

Keep reading, peeps!

Brian Wilson (1988)


I've written before of my ongoing archeological dig through what remains of my cassette tape collection. I'm finding that many of them are no longer playable, either because of overuse or age or a combination of both. So my project has taken on the tone of a recovery mission more than a casually paced preservation exercise.

Of course, what makes the whole effort worthwhile are those rare occasions when I come across something I haven't listened to for years, an album I have not "replaced" on either vinyl or CD or an album I enjoyed for a short time before my ears were led away by something shinier. Generally, when I come across these albums (assuming I had enjoyed them before), it doesn't take long for lyrics and melodies to come rushing out of my subconscious (or wherever it is in the brain that old songs go) and it's like I had never stopped playing the album in question.

Such was my experience the other day when I put Brian Wilson into the tape deck. This 1988 album was the first solo record from the former Beach Boy and was heralded upon its release as something akin to a Second Coming in pop music. And considering the limited output of Wilson albums in the years since this album was released, it still carries a certain aura of something rare and undiscovered.

Anyone who knows the troubled history of Wilson's long fight with manic depression and the bitter recriminations of some of his former band members (who continue to prostitute the name of the Beach Boys as if they had some claim to Wilson's guiding genius, not unlike those lumps who have been touring and recording under the name "Pink Floyd" for the last several years) will appreciate why so many fans treasure the few albums Wilson has released and why, upon their arrival, they are usually afforded such generous critical attention.

Unfortunately, either due to the fickle nature of the radio and recording industries or the short attention span of the average consumer, Brain Wilson doesn't seem to have ever fully received its due as one of the most gorgeous albums in recent years. The songs on this record are joyous, and contain little indication of the emotional challenges faced daily by the man who created them. Any listener armed with the knowledge of those challenges, coupled with the somewhat troubled expression of Wilson on the album's cover, will listen to these songs with a certain degree of heartbreak, which in no way diminishes their beauty.

Among the songs are three true standouts: "Love and Mercy," which opens the album; "Melt Away," and the wordless ode to Wilson's former bandmates, "One for the Boys." It has sometimes been said of Mozart that his music was the closest approximation on Earth to either God's voice or the sounds of heaven, and, despite the inherent hyperbole of that comparison, that is what these songs sound like to me: it is difficult to believe that any human could create something of such ethereal beauty.

My reaction to these songs probably has something to do with what I know about Wilson's life, just as the jazz aficiando can more sharply hear the pain contained in the music of, say, John Coltrane. But I also think anyone who didn't know Wilson's history would still be able to recognize their qualities, and would perhaps enjoy them more fully. Who knows? But there is something inexplicably fascinating about any work of art that comes from a diseased mind and abused creator.

Though largely a love song, "Melt Away" contains a few lyrics that speak to this kind of biography and Wilson's uncertainty in presenting a new collection of songs to a world that has long since moved on from the sunny days at the beach with a radio belting out Beach Boys hits. "The world's not waiting just for me," he sings. "The world don't care what I can be." Somewhere in the genesis of these lines lies a backwards glance over Wilson's shoulder at the abuse he sustained at the hands of his father, back when he was just beginning to find an escape through music. But the song will not sustain this self-reflective pity. "But when I hear you talking/I feel my heart unlockin'/And my blues just melt away/Melt away." These lines are acccompanied by the chimes of some large bell, enhancing the gospel qualities of the song. And, like any of Wilson's classics, the lyrics are supported by an underlying chorus of his overdubbed vocals which weave in and out, above and below the instrumentation. The total effect of the song is much more than mere aural pleasure or escape. The song is transformative, disguising itself as a simple pop tune, a disposable love song.

If "Melt Away" is transformative, "One for the Boys" is an aural key to some unearthly kingdom. In less than two minutes, it delivers a message of such unashamed grace to Wilson's bandmates that it is remarkable that they still find the nerve to perform his songs. Surely no collection of voices, however they might be tied to Wilson in the past, could ever approach the sounds Wilson creates on his own. Contained in this simple number are years of effort, disappointment, success, abandonment, sorrow, and absolution. Wilson recognizes that no words will ever be able to convey the depth of his conflicted feelings toward his bandmates, yet this wordless ode provides more meaning than a shelf full of biographies and criticism.

The album is not without its faults. Some of the numbers are helplessly trapped in the time period in which they were conceived. Not surprisingly, Jeff Lynne's contributions to "Let It Shine" sound particularly dated. The album is also tainted by the participation of Eugene Landy, a man who for years took advantage of Wilson's depression by prescribing copious amounts of mood-numbing drugs, while helping himself to Wilson's home and studio. Landy, a man bereft of any creative ability, shamelessly gives himself songwriting, singing and production credits on the album. (Landy recently died, long after he set back Wilson's personal and professional improvement by untold years.) Additionally, some of the songs are underdeveloped fragments, deserving of further studio work.

But overall, it is hard to think of this record as anything less than a gift. I fear it may only truly be appreciated once Wilson dies. I didn't even think the album was still in print, but I was happy to discover that Rhino Records recently re-released the album with a number of bonus tracks. I realize my effusive praise of this record and my personal appreciation of Wilson may seem excessive and fannish. But, after listening to this record for the last few days, I honestly feel it deserves a spot in the pantheon of popular music. If not a masterpiece on the level of Wilson's Pet Sounds, Brian Wilson's 1988 solo album is certainly one of the finest, and sadly overlooked, albums of the last 25 years.

4.05.2006


Cartoon by Mr. Fish Posted by Picasa

4.03.2006

Overheard at the Bookstore

Both of these "conversations" took place between what I assume were mothers with their young sons. Both "conversations" were overheard by me in a Borders in Las Vegas.

CONVERSATION #1
Mother and 9-10 year-old son browsing through the metaphysical/spiritual section (located obnoxiously close to the Medieval/Renaissance section where I was browsing)

Mother (after son yells out book title to her, something he's been doing for the last 15 minutes): Oh, that's a good one.

Son: Have you read it?

Mother: No, but it has a good aura. I can feel its energy.

Shit, that bitch should be writing for Publisher's Weekly! Either that or lifting rocks with Yoda.

CONVERSATION #2
Mother and 6-7 year-old son. Mother is leaning against a shelf and reading a paperback, effectively blocking anyone else from seeing or being able to reach the rest of the books on the shelf. Son is sitting on the floor at her feet, desperately trying to get her attention.

Mother: Will you shut up! I'm trying to read, but I can't because you keep talking!

I expect this kid will grow up to be either a video game developer or a jock who beats up anyone he sees with a book.

Today's post is dedicated to everyone who read to me as a kid.

Digging for Gold

I suppose it's a good thing Elizabeth Bishop is dead; otherwise, I don't know how anyone could get away with lines like this:

You are living in a world created by Elizabeth Bishop. Granted, our culture owes its shape to plenty of other forces--Hollywood, Microsoft, Rachael Ray--but nothing matches the impact of a great artist, and in the second half of the 20th century, no American artist in any medium was greater than Bishop.

This is how David Orr begins his review of Edgar Allan Poe & the Juke-Box: Uncollected Poems, Drafts, and Fragments in yesterday's NYT Book Review. His first paragraph concludes this way:

The publication of [this book] . . . isn't just a significant event in our poetry; it's part of a continuing alteration in the scale of American life.

Don't get me wrong. I love Bishop's work. One of the professors in my Master's program, Anne Shifrer, sold me on Bishop long ago, and I presented a long paper on Bishop at two conferences (it had something to do with Bishop's use of color). Bishop also comes with the requisites of any great, tragic poet: orphaned at a young age, alcoholic, gay, and with at least two suicidal lovers. These are the kinds of biographical details that win the immediate sympathy of bookish lit students and sensitive MFAs. But her poetry is not the work of some fluttering housewife or some overburdened artiste (Hello, Sylvia Plath!). You can read Bishop in large doses without feeling compelled to either slit your wrists or snap your fingers.

But does the ever-struggling world of poetry need the kind of hyperbole that Orr delivers in his review? Especially for a book of fragments?

I find myself in complete agreement when Orr bemoans the tragic fact that "Bishop's poems are less well known to many people than the lyrics to 'Total Eclipse of the Heart'." And I would be delighted to see someone besides bookish lit students and sensitive MFAs pick up a book of Bishop's work, fragmentary or otherwise. But I'm not sure Orr does Bishop any favors by showering her with the kind of canonical praise generally reserved for poets who have been dead for longer than 25 years.

The publication of this book also raises questions about the legacy owed to our finest writers, questions about the delicate balance between useful literary research, the marketing concerns of publishers, and the morbid curiousity of readers. These questions are, to some degree, addressed in another article published by the NYT, this one outlining the war of words between prominent poetry critic and scholar Helen Vendler and Alice Quinn, poetry editor for The New Yorker, one of the few popular magazines in America still publishing poetry.

The argument is one familiar to any literary student: Is it ethical to publish work that an artist did not see worthy of publication during their lifetime? Courtney Love will tell you that the world needed to see her late husband's private journals, just as Charles Scribner will gleefully share with you the sales figures for the latest novel fragment from Ernest Hemingway. I make it a point not to buy or read these kinds of books.

On the other hand, I have no moral compunctions about buying over-priced Beatles or Bob Dylan or Bruce Springsteen bootleg CDs that preserve, in often excruciating detail, everything those artists happened to commit to tape in the studio. Seriously, I get jazzed listening to Paul & John run through 15 rehearsals of "She Loves You," so who am I to point fingers at corporate greed or the latest scheme by a junkie widow to pay off her creditors and dealers? And speaking as one who has a literature degree, I cannot underestimate the scholarly value of poring through whatever notes and fragments a writer leaves on the floor next to their deathbed. These scribblings often tell us more about the writing process than any number of official biographies or approved journals.

So while I can't say that I'm going to run out and pick up this new book of Bishop's fragments (though, at 367 pages, it is nearly 100 pages longer than the edition I own of Bishop's complete poems), I cannot turn up my nose at either Alice Quinn or Farrar Straus & Giroux for putting it out there. Nor can I entirely dismiss Orr's review. Hyperbole aside, it is sensitive and persuasively written.

When and if I die, there will be a large number of painfully bad journals and at least five overstuffed portfolios of completely rancid poetry for my survivors to pore over. I wish them all the luck in the world getting that shit published. Somewhere, some bored net surfer is dying to know the tragic history behind Chazzbot. Or at least that's what I tell myself when I sit down to post.
************************************
Does anyone know what's happened to Chronicle West? For at least a week now, all I've been able to pull up is a blank, blue screen. I fear some household disaster, perhaps another chimney fire. Schrand, check in!

UPDATE: Huh. Mabye my computer's gone batty. Everything looks fine at CWest today.
************************************
As a semi-professional radio DJ, I feel compelled to distance myself as far as fucking possible from assholes like this.
************************************
Since today marks the first weekday of National Poetry Month, I feel compelled to post a poem of some kind. Maybe I'll get to that later. For now, I'll leave you with links to some of my favorite venues for online poetry: Poetry Daily and Garrison Keillor's daily radio reading, The Writer's Almanac.